During last summer’s rioting in London, white folks took great relish in televising a a black male saying, “I’m ashamed to be black.” After the intense coverage waned, it became obvious that white folks were doing the lions share of that mob action that was curiously coordinated on blackberries while police looked on.
I read a status update a couple of days ago from one of my FB “friends” saying, and I’m summarizing, that if there was one more report of a black person engaging in cannibalism that she would be “resigning’ from the black “race.” On kulturekritic.com, a comment appears next to a picture of a white guy in a tie that says, “he [Eugene] reverted back to his animalistic state.”
These alleged black cannibalistic attackers were “believed” to have ingested this new “street drug” called “bath salts.” Black people have all kinds of ignorant, stinky slang for the nasty stuff we do. You know? You don’t know that? Hmmmm. Well, right now white folks don’t seem to be on the same page on how to explain this sudden behavior by black people. The Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner Department said yesterday that no “bath salts’ were found in the body of Rudy Eugene. Now that white folks have ruled that one out, some of us are wondering what could have made Mr. Eugene behave in such a deranged way. Not me. I’m not wondering that. I’m wondering how that white man really got defaced. And, I’m wondering when an effective number of black people are going to start having confidence in their own reasoning ability and stop replacing it with the shame that has been installed in us by our dominators.
I watched the video that is being reported as the proof of the attack.
(((Shaking my head)))
It has arrows and narration telling us what we’re seeing. Because you sure cannot tell the gender, age, color, height of the shadowy figures on that video. You certainly cannot tell what either of the two figures on the causeway are doing. You really cannot see any kind of an attack.
How does a person, not a bear or tiger, gnaw away 75% of another person’s face for what we’re told is 18 minutes?
You can see three bicyclists ride by during what we’re told is the attack. But, why do none of them seem to slow down or stare?
A few minutes after that, you can see someone who looks to be an enforcement official (police) drive up next to the figures and get out of what appears to be a squad car. In short order, the enforcement-like figure seems to be pointing a gun in the direction of the two figures on the causeway. We are told by the narrator that the official fired at least five times at the attacker. And, we’re told that the attacker who had to be shot was this black male, Rudy Eugene. Why wasn’t a nude, unarmed man first tasered?
Then, then, security vehicles arrive. Security vehicles after police are on the scene?
Strangely, for the first time in the video, the camera pans in close enough to see two persons’ uncovered bodies laying next to one another. The quality of the video is markedly different. Why did the video get closer and clearer after the alleged attack was over? And, even so, I can’t tell that one of the persons is black.
The assassinations of Robert and John Kennedy are recorded on film to some degree but congressional committees were convened to tell people what the videos showed. And, it’s still inconclusive to many people. But, some unknown black guy isn’t going to get that level of scrutiny. Some newscaster narrates the video and then the suspect is just called “the attacker” or “the cannibal” in news stories thereafter as if it is an obvious conclusive fact . Just as it is uncertain to many that Oswald was the person seen at a shooting range in 1963 before JFK’s assassination, how certain can one be that either Rudy Eugene or that the victim, Ronald Poppo, was one of the shadowy figures in that grainy surveillance video?
“I knew my son,” Eugene’s mother, Ruth Charles, told ABC affiliate WPLG. “Rudy will never, never do something like that. Somebody killed him, and they just go and dump him.” That’s quite a bit more plausible than the story we’re being fed now…(sorry for that)
Is it possible that these black males were given some horrible drug concocted by white folks? Yes, it is. But, that wouldn’t explain the need for the questionable video. It would, however, play upon our mistaken belief that we are more susceptible to such foul play because we consume more illegal drugs than anyone else.
Did we learn so little from what has been uncovered about Cointelpro (Counter-intelligence Program) of the 1960s and early 1970s? That was a formal FBI program designed to counter intelligent thought, speech, and action by black people. Enforcement officials (police) lying is standard. These officials even have a name for it— “testilying.” And, their coercion of false testimony by severely compromised black people is also standard.
To my “friend,” you can’t resign from being a black person. You’ll only stop being a “black person” when there is no system that classifies people as such. But shame for being a black person—a victim of white domination? Pshaw. Let me help put this into perspective for you. The second comment, by “TheUnicornCracker”, under the video says “Well, without a doubt, this is by far the weirdest boner I’ve ever gotten.” It has a net 5 thumbs up. White folks needed a distraction maneuver from the Zimmerman and Sandusky cases that are poised to rip open the curtain on white folk’s routine depravity. I recommend you take a look at Cynikal Afrikan’s catalog of whitemarish deeds whenever you feel the urge to believe the next “disgusting black beast” clap-trap story.