The Original Constitution and The Nigger Amendments-Redux
“Paul [Republican party’s candidate for Kentucky’s U.S. Senate seat]thrust us into one of thorniest corners of that larger question: What’s the government’s role in regulating how private actors — private individuals and the private sector — treat people of another race.
The framers of the 14th Amendment wouldn’t go there; in 1868, America wasn’t ready for it. That classic text, the foundation of all civil rights law, deals only with how the state, not individuals or private businesses, should approach racial difference.”
That’s about 150 years now of very bold deceit–possibly including Tamar Jacoby, the author of the CNN article. Racist Man and Racist Woman are very bold. And, very smart.
The current case law on the Fourteenth Amendment is a century and a half of eye-winks between racists (white supremacists) from both sides of that very civil war—that mafia squabble about who has more power over their nigger property, the robber or the thief. To make sure that black people could continue to be mistreated on a large scale by white people, racists just pretended that the 14th Amendment requirement to treat all people equally just applied to actions of persons holding official state government titles while working with the badge/title. They knew/know that all racists/white supremacists are officials of the White Supremacist Collective—they don’t need an employee number. But, I digress. The first paragraph of Article IV, Section 2 had already provided for Equal Protection of the laws of every state since The Constitution was signed in 1787:
“The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”
Why would the Fourteenth Amendment mean “equal protection of the laws” but be confined to acts by state officials? Like I said, that was already in the body of the Constitution. You can find it near the Fugitive Slave Clause. The Fugitive Slave Clause appears in the last paragraph of the same section assuring Equal Protection in the original Constitution—Article IV, Section 2. In that clause, white people were required by the Constitution to help return niggers to their owners of title—no distinction between public or private enterprise or persons. The record shows that the authors of the Fourteenth Amendment, Senators Thaddeus Stevens, Jacob Howard, and Schuyler Colfax and their political allies had witnessed and said they opposed this written CONSTITUTIONAL protection of slavery, a private property enterprise, provided by the Fugitive Slave Clause. Anyways….
It is not logical to this victim that an amendment to the Constitution should be understood to mean something it said before it was amended: “EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS OF ALL CITIZENS OF STATES IN THE UNION.” —- Yet, every Supreme Court SINCE “RECONSTRUCTION” has decided that’s what it meant.
The 14th Amendment was, according to records, supposed to be a back-up plan when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Civil Rights Act of 1866 authorized by the 13th Amendment. But, the 13th and 14th Amendments and all of those “Civil Rights Acts” are suspect.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Civil Rights Act of Easter Egg Sunday…—–
It all started with those “extra” words added at the end of the 13th and 14th and 15th Amendments: “Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.” W h a t ?? The 13th Amendment was the first to have that language added. Why would you need extra legislation to enforce the Constitution? Common law/common sense in the courts enforces all law—let alone the highest law of the land. That extra language at the end of the nigger amendments—the 13th and 14th and the 15th Amendments— drained the gas out of the car. It said that the Amendments themselves should/could be deemed insufficient to banning slavery and mistreatment of black people. And, as we can see, legal slavery and mistreatment of black persons in this part of the world has continued, uninterrupted. Always be careful of extra words when spoken or written by a white person.
The senators who crafted all those extra Amendments and statutes Thaddeus Stevens, Jacob Howard, and Schuyler Colfax had witnessed The Court boldly rule in the infamous Dred Scott case in 1857 before the skirmish with the Confederate states. The Supreme Court of the Civil War/Reconstruction era (reconstruction of the White Supremacy plant on this continent) held that the slave, Dred Scott’s, emancipation in a “free state” by an owner who was a resident of a slave state violated the the owner’s right to Due Process before being deprived of property. How in the world am I supposed to believe that Stevens, Colfax, and Howard were really serious in expecting other white people to abide by laws composed of words that prohibit mistreatment even if the people are black; especially ones that just repeated the same ones found elsewhere in the Constitution but were ignored when black people where concerned? I suspect that the 13th and 14th Amendments were just gentlemen’s agreements to stop the bloodletting skirmish between white people while giving the appearance of ending the bondage of black people to white people. Civility between white people prevails— even in war— when it concerns how to manage their niggers. What those extra amendments and acts did was create a bigger maze of words for niggers like me to get all tripped up in. Hurdles and hoops that beckon on posters in workplaces telling victims to run to the hamster wheel at offices like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Fair Employment and Housing Commission where the dazed and confused victim is told they can work towards a “right to sue letter.”
A right to sue letter. (((shakin’ my head)))
Before the Nigger Amendments and “Civil Rights Acts” nobody needed a “right to sue letter” to get a day in court.
The Supreme Court has always upheld the social order of white domination—sometimes more cleverly deceitful than others. Remember the “all deliberate speed” phrase in the “desegregation” of public schools in 1954? The Court is currently perpetrating that clever, mean, deceitful, criminal action in the mass caging of black males by giving police and prosecutors free reign to trample all over the Fourth Amendment that is supposed to require probable cause and while trampling over their own diluted requirement of Equal Protection of the laws by badge/title- wearing police and prosecutors. (See Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness)
The racists/ white supremacists aren’t confused. They are in control. For now.
Thaddeus Stevens, Jacob Howard, and Schuyler Colfax are dead like John Brown. And, they didn’t get the job done. If these men were not racists/ white supremacists, we victims may never know that.